<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I played with Cuil like everyone else, so far it is a big disappointment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seoaware.com/2008/07/28/played-cuil-big-disappointment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seoaware.com/2008/07/28/played-cuil-big-disappointment/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>Blog - Improve Your Visibility on the Web, SEO, Internet Marketing, Blogging, Social Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 23:52:07 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Temple according to Cuil &#187; SEM Training &#38; Certification</title>
		<link>http://seoaware.com/2008/07/28/played-cuil-big-disappointment/comment-page-1/#comment-1392</link>
		<dc:creator>David Temple according to Cuil &#187; SEM Training &#38; Certification</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoaware.com/?p=1058#comment-1392</guid>
		<description>[...] I played with Cuil like everyone else, so far it is a big disappointment SEO Aware [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I played with Cuil like everyone else, so far it is a big disappointment SEO Aware [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Keegan</title>
		<link>http://seoaware.com/2008/07/28/played-cuil-big-disappointment/comment-page-1/#comment-1350</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Keegan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoaware.com/?p=1058#comment-1350</guid>
		<description>When the search engine results page works (and retrieves relevant results) I like the magazine layout and the inclusion of photographs. Will I quit using Google? No, but it would be nice if Cuil eventually becomes a nice supplement to Google search.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the search engine results page works (and retrieves relevant results) I like the magazine layout and the inclusion of photographs. Will I quit using Google? No, but it would be nice if Cuil eventually becomes a nice supplement to Google search.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Heil</title>
		<link>http://seoaware.com/2008/07/28/played-cuil-big-disappointment/comment-page-1/#comment-1348</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Heil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 14:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoaware.com/?p=1058#comment-1348</guid>
		<description>I totally agree. I&#039;ve been playing with it as well. I am quite shocked and very disappointed as most all terms I searched, the results sucked eggs big time. I mean really sucked.

Not only that; on the term search engine optimization consultants, the category thang on the right produced the EXACT same names as in wikipedia. LOL Talk about unique content? What a joke.

I tried searching for long tale stuff as well. It&#039;s interesting they decided to stick in many pages from the same damn site in the top ten results. I tried many phrases and they don&#039;t seem to care how many pages come from the same site.

I could go on and on and on. They have had plenty of time with this. It&#039;s hard to believe they won&#039;t even compete with meta search engines the way things stand right now.

It was just awful. No words can describe my thoughts correctly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree. I&#8217;ve been playing with it as well. I am quite shocked and very disappointed as most all terms I searched, the results sucked eggs big time. I mean really sucked.</p>
<p>Not only that; on the term search engine optimization consultants, the category thang on the right produced the EXACT same names as in wikipedia. LOL Talk about unique content? What a joke.</p>
<p>I tried searching for long tale stuff as well. It&#8217;s interesting they decided to stick in many pages from the same damn site in the top ten results. I tried many phrases and they don&#8217;t seem to care how many pages come from the same site.</p>
<p>I could go on and on and on. They have had plenty of time with this. It&#8217;s hard to believe they won&#8217;t even compete with meta search engines the way things stand right now.</p>
<p>It was just awful. No words can describe my thoughts correctly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
